Everything that makes OpenWOP a standard — the wire contract, the evolution process, the security posture, and the project that maintains them — lives in one of six surfaces below. This page exists so a reviewer can find the surface they need without digging through the index.
Specification
The normative wire contract for v1.x.
- Spec corpus → — 55 prose specs, thematically grouped (foundation, runtime, agents, humans, transports, security, ecosystem, production, integration). The specs are independently citable; each carries a status banner from the legend on
auth.md. - REST API reference → — every endpoint with request, response, and error envelope, rendered from
api/openapi.yaml. - Profiles → — the coherent capability slices a host can claim (
openwop-core,openwop-stream-sse,openwop-secrets,openwop-provider-policy,openwop-node-packs, etc.).
Comparisons and positioning
Where OpenWOP sits relative to adjacent agent protocols.
- A2A vs MCP vs OpenWOP → — a specification-level comparison of agent-to-agent collaboration, tool/context integration, and durable workflow orchestration.
- OpenExO 3.0 and OpenWOP → — an architecture thesis for using OpenWOP as the durable execution protocol beneath OpenExO 3.0, the Intelligence Stack, REWRITE, and Edge Twins.
- Positioning & non-goals → — the normative OpenWOP positioning surface inside the v1 spec.
Conformance
How a host proves it implements the spec.
- Conformance leaderboard → — live record of which hosts pass which scenarios, sourced from
INTEROP-MATRIX.md. - Conformance suite → —
@openwop/openwop-conformance, the npm-published behavioural test suite that gates every leaderboard row. - Error codes → — the canonical error vocabulary every conforming host emits.
RFCs
How the protocol evolves.
- RFC index → — every RFC, status, and target version. v1.x stays additive-only per
COMPATIBILITY.md. - RFC process → — what counts as Draft / Active / Accepted, the comment-window discipline, and the path to a v2 working group.
Governance
Who decides what gets in, and how.
- Governance → — decision rules, role definitions, the bootstrap-phase amendment, and the cross-vendor working-group charter for v2.
- Maintainers → — current maintainer set, recruitment criteria, and the affiliation policy that drives the vendor-neutral-org migration tripwire.
- Contributing → — per-artifact change rules (editorial / additive / safety-fix / breaking), the eight-step CI gate, the DCO requirement.
Security
What's promised, what's threat-modelled, and how to report a vulnerability.
- Security posture → — threat model, disclosure policy, public invariants (CTI-1, SR-1, MCP-1).
- GitHub Security Advisories → — coordinated disclosure channel for vulnerabilities.
Versioning and roadmap
What's stable, what's planned, what's tracked but not committed.
- Versioning policy → — additive within v1.x, the 90-day safety-fix window, breaking changes only in major versions.
- Changelog → — every spec, schema, SDK, and reference-host change with its compatibility classification.
- Roadmap → — gap-closure tracks the steward maintains in the open. No dates beyond what has a
CHANGELOG.mdentry.
See also
- Community — channels, comment windows, and how to file an RFC.
- Implementing OpenWOP — the four role-specific entry points.
- Read the paper — OpenWOP: A Vendor-Neutral Protocol for Durable, Portable Agentic Workflow Orchestration (Zenodo, CC BY 4.0): the protocol-level argument, a reproducible cross-language portability result, and the full evidence artifact.