Everything that makes OpenWOP a standard — the wire contract, the evolution process, the security posture, and the project that maintains them — lives in one of six surfaces below. This page exists so a reviewer can find the surface they need without digging through the index.
Specification
The normative wire contract. v2 was cut 2026-09-05 and is the current major; v1.x continues as a parallel track, receiving additive and safety-fix releases until the host-inventory rule in COMPATIBILITY.md §5 retires it.
- v2 spec corpus → — 37 prose documents: 20 normative core docs plus 17 extension families advertised under
extensions.<org>.<key>. - REST API reference → — every endpoint with request, response, and error envelope, rendered from
api/openapi.yaml. - Profiles → — v2 keeps the profile set deliberately small:
openwop-discovery-core,openwop-core-standard, and theopenwop-conformance-seams-v2test-seam profile. Everything else a host can claim is a capability key in the capability record —secrets,nodePackRuntimes,interrupt,production,runListand the rest — advertised individually rather than bundled into more profiles.
Comparisons and positioning
Where OpenWOP sits relative to adjacent agent protocols.
- A2A vs MCP vs OpenWOP → — a specification-level comparison of agent-to-agent collaboration, tool/context integration, and durable workflow orchestration.
- Tool calling → — what tool calling standardizes, and the four surfaces OpenWOP adds on top of it: catalog, durable invocation events, fail-closed authorization, and effect idempotency.
- OpenExO 3.0 and OpenWOP → — an architecture thesis for using OpenWOP as the durable execution protocol beneath OpenExO 3.0, the Intelligence Stack, REWRITE, and Edge Twins.
- Overview & axioms → — the six axioms, the claim vocabulary, and the rule deciding what is core and what is an extension.
Conformance
How a host proves it implements the spec.
- Conformance leaderboard → — live record of which hosts pass which scenarios, sourced from
INTEROP-MATRIX.md. - Conformance suite → —
@openwop/openwop-conformance, the npm-published behavioural test suite that gates every leaderboard row. - Error codes → — the canonical error vocabulary every conforming host emits.
RFCs
How the protocol evolves.
- RFC index → — every RFC, status, and target version. each major stays additive-only per
COMPATIBILITY.md. - RFC process → — what counts as Draft / Active / Accepted, the comment-window discipline, and the path to a v2 working group.
Governance
Who decides what gets in, and how.
- Governance → — decision rules, role definitions, the bootstrap-phase amendment, and the cross-vendor working-group charter for v2.
- Maintainers → — current maintainer set, recruitment criteria, and the affiliation policy that drives the vendor-neutral-org migration tripwire.
- Contributing → — per-artifact change rules (editorial / additive / safety-fix / breaking), the eight-step CI gate, the DCO requirement.
Security
What's promised, what's threat-modelled, and how to report a vulnerability.
- Security posture → — threat model, disclosure policy, public invariants (CTI-1, SR-1, MCP-1).
- GitHub Security Advisories → — coordinated disclosure channel for vulnerabilities.
Versioning and roadmap
What's stable, what's planned, what's tracked but not committed.
- Versioning policy → — additive within a major, the 90-day safety-fix window, breaking changes only in major versions.
- Changelog → — every spec, schema, SDK, and reference-host change with its compatibility classification.
- Roadmap → — gap-closure tracks the steward maintains in the open. No dates beyond what has a
CHANGELOG.mdentry.
See also
- Community — channels, comment windows, and how to file an RFC.
- Implementing OpenWOP — the four role-specific entry points.
- Read the paper — OpenWOP: A Vendor-Neutral Protocol for Durable, Portable Agentic Workflow Orchestration (Zenodo, CC BY 4.0): the protocol-level argument, a reproducible cross-language portability result, and the full evidence artifact.